g-boaf wrote: ↑Sat Jul 01, 2023 1:58 pm
Personally, if some newcomer has big speed but not the race craft I wouldn't want to see them in A grade right away, it just seems like a recipe for disaster. Mind you I've seen complaints about experience A-graders (one riding for a team) doing dumb things in a race as well. You could call it race strategy, but it could have created an accident if the other person wasn't alert. There were angry words exchanged over that one.
I'm not involved in all of that stuff - after the AusCycling carve-up I just thought stuff it, not happy with that and I don't want anything to do with them. I know I wasn't the only one.
I think if someone has not raced before, or even ridden in a bunch, they need to learn the craft. It does not matter how big their engine is. I don't think anyone would be fussed if you say "look, we know you have a big engine but for your safety we don't want you contesting any sprints. You won't be eligible for any podiums until we say so".
I decided during my recovery, with all the mess around AusCycling, not to participate in that anymore. I'm quite happy just doing my Audax and some closed road events, and more recently some multi-day bikepacking events with friends. I just don't see the need to put myself in harms way tearing around a race track.
Events like Peaks, Fitzs Challenge or things like Go For Broke, I do just as much for the social aspect as for the challenge, but some of these events are just getting stupidly expensive.
I did the Central West Trail with some friends back in October and the entire 4 day weekend we did was still cheaper than the entry for some of these events. If an event has some sort of unique route you can't otherwise do, I'm up for it. Peaks I am having another crack at, just because it was cancelled in 2023 and my entry moved over (and I want to do a solid sub-10hr), and I am signed up for Thunderbolt's Adventure in 2024 for a gravel weekend.
But yeah, AusCycling I just have a Lifestyle Membership and that's how it will stay.